Home India RURAL DEVELOPMENT Parliament Question: eMarg Portal under PMGSY...
Date: 2026-02-03 Category: Not Applicable State: Union Government Country: India

Parliament Question: eMarg Portal under PMGSY

Issued by RURAL DEVELOPMENT · Not Applicable

Research with AI Agent Chat with Document Generate Summary Translate Helpful Share Add to Project Create Task

Executive Summary & Key Takeaways

**Executive Summary** This document is a response to questions raised in the Lok Sabha regarding the maintenance and sustainability of roads constructed under the Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY). It outlines the measures taken by the Ministry of Rural Development, including guidelines for state governments, the utilization of the eMARG portal, and quality control mechanisms. Data as of January 28, 2026, regarding maintenance liability and expenditure, as well as roads requiring urgent maintenance, is provided. **Key Points / Main Content** * **Maintenance Responsibility:** * Maintenance of PMGSY roads is the responsibility of State Governments. * All road works are covered by initial five-year maintenance contracts with the same contractor. * State Governments must budget maintenance funds and allocate them to State Rural Roads Development Agencies (SRRDAs). * After the initial 5-year maintenance, roads are placed under Zonal maintenance contracts. * State governments are to provide necessary funds in SRRDA for zonal maintenance contracts. * **Road Standards and Defect Liability:** * Roads are designed and executed according to Indian Roads Congress (IRC) standards. * Roads are subject to a five-year Defect Liability Period (DLP) at no additional cost for defect rectification. * Provision is made for paid maintenance for five years. * Deterioration may occur due to specific factors like heavy rainfall, flooding, vehicle overloading, and inadequate drainage maintenance, not systemic deficiencies. * States are urged to enforce maintenance, reporting and drainage, and use digital monitoring tools. * **eMARG Portal:** * The Ministry has operationalized the eMARG portal for transparent maintenance planning, monitoring, and execution. * States/UTs are increasingly using eMARG for online planning, approval, and fund tracking. * The system supports geo-tagging, time-stamped photos, and road-wise reporting. * As of 28.01.2026, the expenditure reported under DLP is ₹667 crore against the total maintenance liability of ₹1,696 crore for 2025-26. * Under post-DLP, an expenditure of ₹527 crore has been incurred on renewal of roads under PMGSY. * **Post-DLP Maintenance:** * States/UTs must allocate adequate funds for routine and periodic maintenance post-DLP. * The eMARG platform monitors road conditions, identifies defects, and prioritizes work. * Contractors do not receive payment if a road scores below 80% in Performance Evaluation (PE). * The number of roads with less than 80% marks in PE during 2025-26, requiring urgent attention, is listed in Annexure-III. * **Sustainability Measures:** * The Ministry has implemented institutional, technical, and monitoring measures for long-term sustainability. * Oversight is strengthened by the eMARG portal and its integration with OMMAS. * A three-tier quality management system identifies deficiencies and ensures rectification. * States are advised to ensure timely release of funds, proper drainage upkeep, and prompt defect reporting. * The Ministry promotes climate-resilient designs, improved drainage, appropriate technologies, and prioritisation of renewal works. * Policy initiatives, such as PMGSY-III and PMGSY-IV, aim to safeguard long-term serviceability. **Impact Analysis** **State Governments** * **Impact:** Responsible for the maintenance of PMGSY roads, including budgeting and fund allocation. Subject to monitoring and quality control measures. * **Action Required:** Ensure strict enforcement of maintenance provisions, prompt defect reporting, adequate drainage upkeep, and utilisation of the eMARG portal for transparent planning, monitoring, and execution of maintenance. **Contractors** * **Impact:** Responsible for maintaining roads during the initial five-year DLP. Payments are contingent on performance evaluation scores. * **Action Required:** Conduct thorough maintenance during the DLP and address any defects promptly to achieve a Performance Evaluation score of at least 80%. **Ministry of Rural Development** * **Impact:** Overseeing the PMGSY program and ensuring the long-term sustainability of rural roads. * **Action Required:** Continue implementing institutional, technical, and monitoring measures, leveraging digital monitoring tools, and promoting climate-resilient designs. Review State performance and identify/rectify systemic issues. **Rural Communities** * **Impact:** Directly benefit from well-maintained and sustainable rural road networks. * **Action Required:** Report any defects or issues related to road maintenance to the appropriate authorities. **State Rural Roads Development Agencies (SRRDAs)** * **Impact:** Receive and manage maintenance funds allocated by State Governments. * **Action Required:** Ensure proper allocation and utilization of funds for timely maintenance and repair of PMGSY roads.

Key Entities Referenced

Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY): A rural road construction and maintenance scheme in India. Ministry of Rural Development: The Indian ministry responsible for rural development programs, including PMGSY. eMARG portal: Electronic portal for monitoring maintenance fund releases and renewal works under PMGSY.
Official Source Record View Original Source →
See Full Document Text
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. 462 ANSWERED ON 03/02/2026 EMARG PORTAL UNDER PMGSY 462. Adv. Chandra Shekhar: Will the Minister of RURAL DEVELOPMENT be pleased to state: (a) the reasons for reported deterioration in a portion of completed Pradhan Mantri Gram SadakYojana (PMGSY) roads, despite the provision for five years defect liability and paid maintenance by contractors; (b) the progress made in utilizing the eMARG portal for monitoring maintenance fund releases and renewal works during 2025-26; (c) the details of roads requiring urgent attention and their impact on rural communities, State-wise; and (d) the measures, including enhanced oversight or policy adjustments, that the Ministry is considering to ensure long- term sustainability and proper upkeep of the completed rural road network? ANSWER MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT (SHRI KAMLESH PASWAN) (a) & (b): As per the guidelines of Pradhan Mantri Gram SadakYojana (PMGSY) maintenance of roads constructed under the programme is the responsibility of the State Governments and all road works are covered by initial five year maintenance contracts to be entered into along with the construction contract, with the same contractor, as per the Standard Bidding Document. Maintenance funds to service the contract are required to be budgeted by the State Governments and placed at the disposal of the State Rural Roads Development Agencies (SRRDAs) in a separate maintenance account. On expiry of the 5 year post construction maintenance, PMGSY roads are required to be placed under Zonal maintenance contracts consisting of 5 year maintenance including renewal as per cycle, from time to time. The State Governments are required to Page 1 of 7make the necessary budget provision and place the funds in SRRDA for such Zonal maintenance contracts. The roads constructed under PMGSY are designed and executed in accordance with Indian Roads Congress (IRC) standards and are subject to a five-year Defect Liability Period (DLP), during which the concerned contractor is responsible for rectification of defects at no additional cost. In addition, provision is made for paid maintenance for five years to ensure the serviceability of the road. Instances of deterioration reported in some completed PMGSY roads are localized and attributable to specific factors, such as unprecedented heavy rainfall, flooding, overloading by vehicles beyond the design capacity, damage due to utility cuts and encroachments, inadequate drainage maintenance and traffic growth exceeding initial projections, particularly in rapidly developing rural areas. In certain cases, delays in timely reporting of defects, constraints in local maintenance arrangements, or execution of works by third agencies without proper restoration have also contributed to premature distress. Such instances do not reflect systemic deficiencies in the programme. Further, States are advised to ensure strict enforcement of maintenance provisions, prompt defect reporting, and adequate drainage upkeep, while leveraging digital monitoring tools to enhance accountability and durability of rural road assets. The Ministry of Rural Development has operationalised the electronic Maintenance of Rural Roads (eMARG) portal under the Pradhan Mantri Gram SadakYojana (PMGSY) to enable transparent planning, monitoring and execution of maintenance and renewal works of rural roads.During 2025–26, States and Union Territories have been increasingly utilising the eMARG portal for online planning, approval and monitoring of routine maintenance and periodic renewal works, along with tracking of associated fund flows for PMGSY roads, including those beyond the initial five-year Defect Liability Period (DLP). The system supports geo-tagging, time-stamped photographic evidence and road-wise reporting, thereby enhancing transparency and accountability. As on 28.01.2026, against a total maintenance liability of ₹1,696 crore for 2025-26, an expenditure of ₹667 crore has been reported by the States/UTs under DLP. The State-wise details of liability and expenditure are given at Annexure-I. Under the post-DLP, an expenditure of ₹527 crore has been incurred on renewal of roads Page 2 of 7under PMGSY. The State-wise details of expenditure incurred are given at Annexure-II. (c): On completion of the Defect Liability Period (DLP), States/UTs are required to earmark adequate funds for routine and periodic maintenance of these roads as per PMGSY guidelines. The condition of PMGSY roads is regularly monitored through eMARG platform which captures maintenance requirements, defects and prioritization of works, including roads requiring urgent attention. eMARG has arrangements that if the road after inspection get less than 80% marks in Performance Evaluation (PE), the contractor does not get any payments for that bill. The State/UT-wise number of roads which has got less than 80% marks in PE during financial year 2025-26 (as on 28.01.2026) requiring urgent maintenance attention are given at Annexure-III. (d): The Ministry of Rural Development has put in place a series of institutional, technical and monitoring measures to ensure the long- term sustainability and proper upkeep of the rural road network created under PMGSY. This includes maintenance of PMGSY roads through a five-year DLP with paid maintenance by contractors, followed by post-DLP maintenance by State Governments. To strengthen oversight, the Ministry has operationalised the electronic Maintenance of Rural Roads (eMARG) portal, which enables road-wise planning, monitoring and reporting of maintenance and renewal works, along with tracking of maintenance fund flows. Integration of eMARG with OMMAS facilitates data-driven monitoring and improved financial reconciliation. A three-tier quality management system, comprising in-house checks, State Quality Monitors and National Quality Monitors (NQMs), continually identify deficiencies and ensure timely rectification. States are regularly reviewed and advised to ensure timely release and utilisation of adequate maintenance funds, proper upkeep of drainage, and prompt reporting of defects. The Ministry is also encouraging adoption of climate-resilient designs, improved drainage standards, use of appropriate technologies and materials, and prioritisation of renewal of aged and heavily trafficked rural roads. Further, policy initiatives such as consolidation of rural road networks under PMGSY-III and the conceptualisation of PMGSY-IV, which focuses on renewal and sustainability of existing rural roads, are aimed at safeguarding the long-term serviceability of the assets. Page 3 of 7***** Page 4 of 7Annexure-I Annexure referred to in reply to parts (a) & (b) of LokSabha Unstarred Question No. 462 for answer on 03.02.2026 State-wise details of maintenance liability and expenditure incurred on the maintenance of roads during Financial Year 2025-26 (as on 28.01.2026): Maintenance Liability Expenditure Sl. No. State/UT (Rs. in crores) (Rs. in crores) Andaman and Nicobar 1 Islands 1.01 0.02 2 Andhra Pradesh 19.55 8.67 3 Arunachal Pradesh 80.72 4.76 4 Assam 132.36 66.75 5 Bihar 128.52 59.05 6 Chhattisgarh 94.56 36.88 7 Gujarat 16.93 4.75 8 Haryana 19.60 8.31 9 Himachal Pradesh 65.85 14.20 10 Jammu and Kashmir 93.07 27.59 11 Jharkhand 124.15 10.40 12 Karnataka 64.36 18.89 13 Kerala 5.67 2.64 14 Ladakh 7.97 2.62 15 Madhya Pradesh 108.39 72.22 16 Maharashtra 26.12 8.88 17 Manipur 16.73 4.21 18 Meghalaya 40.48 19.06 19 Mizoram 4.53 2.09 20 Nagaland 7.48 1.99 21 Odisha 130.66 43.84 22 Puducherry 0.00 0.00 23 Punjab 12.99 7.04 24 Rajasthan 48.74 17.17 25 Sikkim 7.34 0.87 26 Tamil Nadu 44.05 29.40 27 Telangana 9.89 3.38 28 Tripura 13.97 2.89 29 Uttar Pradesh 224.60 117.60 30 Uttarakhand 52.05 24.14 31 West Bengal 93.79 46.58 Total 1696.13 666.91 Page 5 of 7Annexure-II Annexure referred to in reply to parts (a) & (b) of LokSabha Unstarred Question No. 462 for answer on 03.02.2026 State-wise details of expenditure incurred during Financial Year 2025-26 (as on 28.01.2026) on PMGSY roads during post Defect Liability Period (DLP) Total Expenditure (Rs. in crore) Sl. No. State (Through Post DLP on Renewal) 1 Arunachal Pradesh 4.46 2 Assam 51.11 3 Chhattisgarh 76.49 4 Gujarat 3.37 5 Haryana 0.00 6 Himachal Pradesh 8.98 7 Jammu and Kashmir 17.23 8 Karnataka 0.00 9 Kerala 1.49 10 Madhya Pradesh 184.48 11 Maharashtra 30.22 12 Meghalaya 1.11 13 Odisha 3.62 14 Rajasthan 21.22 15 Sikkim 0.00 16 Tamil Nadu 22.25 17 Tripura 2.65 18 Uttar Pradesh 80.41 19 Uttarakhand 0.55 20 West Bengal 17.23 Total 526.88 Page 6 of 7Annexure-III Annexure referred to in reply to part (c) of LokSabha Unstarred Question No. 462 for answer on 03.02.2026 State/UT-wise number of roads which have got less than 80% marks in Performance Evaluation (PE) during Financial Year 2025-26 (as on 28.01.2026) Sl. State/UT Total Roads No. of roads where PE Marks No. (Ongoing) (less than 80%) 1 Andaman and Nicobar 67 35 Islands 2 Andhra Pradesh 804 31 3 Arunachal Pradesh 451 37 4 Assam 2894 226 5 Bihar 7093 1202 6 Chhattisgarh 1659 141 8 Gujarat 270 35 9 Haryana 257 46 10 Himachal Pradesh 1007 431 11 Jammu and Kashmir 1181 249 12 Jharkhand 4329 595 13 Karnataka 823 41 14 Kerala 234 45 15 Ladakh 50 1 17 Madhya Pradesh 1829 199 18 Maharashtra 700 113 19 Manipur 388 29 20 Meghalaya 657 89 21 Mizoram 100 17 22 Nagaland 58 6 23 Odisha 5062 1572 24 Puducherry 2 0 25 Punjab 465 21 26 Rajasthan 1672 167 27 Sikkim 174 81 28 Tamil Nadu 2231 63 29 Telangana 548 157 30 Tripura 163 85 31 Uttar Pradesh 3190 120 32 Uttarakhand 964 189 33 West Bengal 1549 386 Total 40871 6409 ***** Page 7 of 7

Continue your research