Home India LAW AND JUSTICE Parliament Question: Fast Track Special Courts (FTSCs) in Ut...
Date: 2026-02-06 Category: Not Applicable State: Union Government Country: India

Parliament Question: Fast Track Special Courts (FTSCs) in Uttar Pradesh

Issued by LAW AND JUSTICE · Not Applicable

Research with AI Agent Chat with Document Generate Summary Translate Helpful Share Add to Project Create Task

Executive Summary & Key Takeaways

**Executive Summary** This document is the official answer to Unstarred Question No. †1351 raised in Lok Sabha, concerning the status of Fast Track Special Courts (FTSCs) in Uttar Pradesh as of February 6, 2026. The response, provided by the Minister of State for Law and Justice, details the number of operational FTSCs, pending cases, sanctioned posts, infrastructure improvements, and other related measures taken by the government. District-wise breakdowns of FTSCs, pending cases, and staff vacancies are provided in Annexures I and II. **Key Points / Main Content** * **Operational FTSCs:** * 218 FTSCs are functional in Uttar Pradesh, including 74 exclusively dedicated to POCSO cases. * District-wise details, including the pendency of rape and POCSO cases, are in Annexure-I. * **Staffing:** * Each FTSC is to be staffed with one Presiding Officer and seven support staff, as per FTSC Scheme guidelines. * 218 Additional District & Sessions Judges and 1,526 support staff posts have been sanctioned. * Outsourcing of Junior Assistant, Orderly/Peon, and Daftari posts has been reconsidered for POCSO courts due to the sensitive nature of documents handled. * District-wise details of sanctioned posts and vacancies are in Annexure-II. * **Recruitment:** * Filling vacant judicial officer positions in FTSCs is the responsibility of the State/UT Governments and the High Courts, following Constitutional framework and established rules. * **Infrastructure and Case Management:** * The Central Government supports FTSCs through the Centrally Sponsored Scheme (CSS) for Development of Judicial Infrastructure, aiding the construction of court halls, residential units, and digital computer rooms. * The government is implementing e-Courts Project Phase-III to strengthen digital case management, including implementing CIS 4.0 and providing public access to case information through the National Judicial Data Grid (NJDG) and mobile apps. * Digital Courts 2.1 is being piloted to enable paperless courts, and LegRAA, an AI-based legal research tool, has been developed. * **Monitoring and Coordination:** * Regular review meetings are held via Video Conferencing with the States/UTs and High Courts to strengthen the functioning of FTSCs. * Inter-State Zonal Council meetings address FTSC performance and improve inter-governmental coordination. **Impact Analysis** **Stakeholder: State/UT Governments and High Courts** * **Impact:** Responsible for filling vacant positions of judicial officers in District and Subordinate courts including the FTSCs. Responsible for the recruitment and appointment of judicial officers. * **Action Required:** Fill vacant judicial officer positions in FTSCs and implement the rules regarding the recruitment and appointment of Judicial Officers. **Stakeholder: Judicial Officers and Staff of FTSCs** * **Impact:** Affected by staffing levels, infrastructure, and case management systems in place at FTSCs. * **Action Required:** Utilize available resources and technology to expedite case disposal and ensure compliance with established timelines. **Stakeholder: Litigants and Lawyers** * **Impact:** Benefit from strengthened digital case management systems, improved infrastructure, and expedited justice delivery in FTSCs. * **Action Required:** Utilize eCourts Services Mobile App and other resources for access to case information and efficient case management.

Key Entities Referenced

Fast Track Special Courts (FTSCs): Courts specifically dedicated to cases related to POCSO and other sexual offences. Uttar Pradesh: Indian state where the Fast Track Special Courts are located. POCSO Act: Referenced in the context of ensuring compliance with timelines for cases related to it. High Court of Allahabad: Provides data regarding functional FTSCs to the government. Fast Track Special Courts (FTSCs) Scheme: Scheme providing guidelines for staffing FTSCs.
Official Source Record View Original Source →
See Full Document Text
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE LOK SABHA UNSTARRED QUESTION NO. †1351 TO BE ANSWERED ON FRIDAY, THE 06th FEBRUARY, 2026 FAST TRACK SPECIAL COURTS (FTSCS) IN UTTAR PRADESH †1351. SHRI RAMASHANKAR VIDHARTHI RAJBHAR: Will the Minister of Law and Justice be pleased to state: (a) the number of currently operational Fast Track Special Courts (FTSCs) in Uttar Pradesh specifically dedicated to cases related to POCSO and other sexual offences, district-wise; (b) the updated number of pending rape and POCSO cases in these FTSCs, district-wise; (c) the status of sanctioned posts and vacancies in FTSCs including judicial officers, public prosecutors and supporting staff, district-wise; (d) the number of posts filled so far along with the current status of the process for filling up the remaining vacancies; and (e) whether the Government has initiated measures to improve infrastructure, augment human resources, strengthen digital case-management systems and monitoring mechanisms in FTSCs to reduce pendency of cases, if so, the details thereof and if not, the reasons therefor? ANSWER MINISTER OF STATE (INDEPENDENT CHARGE) OF THE MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE; AND MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS (SHRI ARJUN RAM MEGHWAL) (a) & (b): As per the information received from the High Court of Allahabad, 218 FTSCs including 74 exclusive POCSO courts are functional in the State of Uttar Pradesh. The district wise details of functional FTSCs along with pendency of rape and POCSO cases in these courts, are placed at Annexure -I. (c): As per the guidelines of the Fast Track Special Courts (FTSCs) Scheme, each FTSC is to be staffed with one Presiding Officer and seven support staff. 1As per the information received from the High Court of Allahabad, 218 posts of Additional District & Sessions Judges and 1,526 posts of supporting staff were sanctioned for 218 FTSCs, including 74 exclusive POCSO Courts, under the Scheme. The break-up of total sanctioned strength is as under: Sr. No. Name of Post Number of Sanctioned posts 1. Additional District & Sessions Judges 218 2. Stenographer Grade-I 218 3. Munsrim, Reader 218 Senior Assistant (Suits Clerk, Session 4. 218 Clerk, Misc. Clerk) 5. Junior Assistant (Copyist) 218 (Outsourcing) 6. Orderly (Peon) 436 (Outsourcing) 7. Daftari 218 (Outsourcing) TOTAL 1744 The district-wise details of sanctioned posts and vacancies for judicial officers and supporting staff in FTSCs, are place at Annexure -II. The High Court of Allahabad has further informed that 218 posts of Junior Assistant (Copyist), 436 posts of Orderly/Peon and 218 posts of Daftari were initially proposed to be filled through outsourcing. However, the Hon’ble Committee constituted for Monitoring the Expeditious Disposal of Rape and POCSO Act Cases resolved that staff attached to POCSO Courts handle sensitive judicial records and such important documents have to be handled only by regular cadre. (d): As regards the recruitment of judges/prosecutors and staff in courts, filling up of vacant positions of the judicial officers in District and Subordinate courts including the FTSCs, is the responsibility of the State/UT Governments and the concerned High Courts. As per the Constitutional framework, in exercise of powers conferred under proviso to Article 309 read with Articles 233 and 234 of the Constitution, the State/UT Government in consultation with the respective High Court frames the rules regarding the recruitment and appointment of Judicial Officers. (e): The Central Government has taken several steps to support infrastructure, strengthen digital case-management systems and monitoring mechanisms in FTSCs to reduce pendency of cases: (i) The Centrally Sponsored Scheme (CSS) for Development of Judicial Infrastructure supplements efforts of the States in building court halls, residential units, lawyers' halls, toilet 2complexes, and digital computer rooms for District and Subordinate Courts including FTSCs. Total central assistance of Rs. 1,756.41 crore (as on 31.12.2025) has been provided to the State of Uttar Pradesh since the inception of the Scheme, out of which Rs. 1,205.11 crore has been provided since FY 2014-15. As on 31.12.2025, State of Uttar Pradesh has 2,923 court halls. (ii) The Government of India is implementing e-Courts Project Phase-III, in close coordination with the eCommittee of the Supreme Court of India through the respective High Courts. To strengthen digital case management, Case Information Software (CIS) 4.0 has been implemented in all court complexes; the National Judicial Data Grid (NJDG) provides public access to case information; electronic case management tools such as the eCourts Services Mobile App for litigants and lawyers and the JustIS Mobile App for Judicial Officers are operational, with 3,54,86,435 and 22,090 downloads respectively as on 31.12.2025; Digital Courts 2.1 has been developed to enable paperless courts and is under pilot implementation. In addition, an AI-based tool called Legal Research Analysis Assistant (LegRAA) has been developed to support judicial research and analysis. (iii) In order to strengthen functioning of FTSCs, regular review meetings are held via Video Conferencing with the States/UTs and the High Courts. The Hon’ble Minister of Law & Justice has written to Hon’ble Chief Ministers and Chief Justices of the High Courts regarding need for timely action and strict compliance with timelines under the POCSO Act and Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. In addition, the performance of FTSCs is a regular agenda item in the Inter-State Zonal Council meetings to improve inter-governmental coordination and expedite justice delivery. **** 3Annexure -I District-wise details of functional FTSCs in the State of Uttar Pradesh along with pendency of rape and POCSO cases in these FTSCs as on 31.12.2025 Sr. Total No. of Pendency of Rape and Districts No functional FTSCs POCSO cases in FTSCs 1 Agra 4 2334 2 Aligarh 4 2000 3 Allahabad (Prayagraj) 4 2113 4 Ambedkar Nagar 3 1058 5 Auraiya 2 1035 6 Azamgarh 3 2514 7 Bagpat 2 667 8 Bahraich 3 1937 9 Ballia 3 1326 10 Balrampur 3 659 11 Banda 2 1073 12 Barabanki 3 1299 13 Bareilly 4 3443 14 Basti 3 1019 15 Sant Ravidas Nagar (Bhadohi) 2 113 16 Bijnor 2 641 17 Budaun 4 1304 18 Bulandshahr 4 2167 19 Chandauli 2 570 20 Chitrakoot 2 436 21 Deoria 3 1469 22 Etah 3 761 23 Etawah 2 513 24 Faizabad (Ayodhya) 3 725 25 Farrukhabad 3 926 26 Fatehpur 3 1733 27 Firozabad 4 1010 28 Gautam Buddh Nagar 3 1525 29 Ghaziabad 4 2653 30 Ghazipur 3 1757 31 Gonda 2 698 32 Gorakhpur 4 2760 33 Hamirpur 3 1134 34 Panchsheel Nagar district (Hapur) 3 625 35 Hathras 2 459 36 Hardoi 4 1789 37 Jalaun 2 796 4Sr. Total No. of Pendency of Rape and Districts No functional FTSCs POCSO cases in FTSCs 38 Jaunpur 3 1758 39 Jhansi 2 1110 40 Jyotiba Phule Nagar (Amroha) 3 446 41 Kannauj 2 873 42 Ramabai Nagar (Kanpur Dehat) 3 1937 43 Kanpur 3 2295 44 Kasganj 2 844 45 Kaushambi 4 980 46 Kushinagar 4 2029 47 Lakhimpur Kheri 3 840 48 Lalitpur 2 543 49 Lucknow 4 2827 50 Maharajganj 3 1618 51 Mahoba 2 402 52 Mainpuri 3 1065 53 Mathura 3 1041 54 Mau 3 617 55 Meerut 4 1971 56 Mirzapur 2 899 57 Moradabad 3 1396 58 Muzaffarnagar 3 1446 59 Pilibhit 3 867 60 Pratapgarh 3 1565 61 Raebareli 4 2224 62 Rampur 3 478 63 Saharanpur 3 1132 64 Sambhal 2 972 65 Sant Kabir Nagar 3 970 66 Shahjahanpur 3 1672 67 Shamli 2 615 68 Shravasti 2 192 69 Siddharth Nagar 3 1008 70 Sitapur 4 1945 71 Sonbhadra 2 643 72 Sultanpur 3 1583 73 Unnao 3 1602 74 Varanasi 4 2011 Total 218 95457 Source: As per data provided by the High Court. 5Annexure -II The district-wise details of sanctioned posts and vacancies in FTSCs Judicial Officers in FTSCs 7 support staff for each FTSC Sr.No Districts Total Total Sanctioned Vacant Sanctioned Vacant strength strength 1 Agra 4 28 9 2 Aligarh 4 28 11 3 Allahabad (Prayagraj) 4 28 10 4 Ambedkar Nagar 3 2 21 7 5 Auraiya 2 1 14 6 6 Azamgarh 3 21 9 7 Bagpat 2 1 14 2 8 Bahraich 3 1 21 6 9 Ballia 3 2 21 5 10 Balrampur 3 2 21 7 11 Banda 2 14 5 12 Barabanki 3 21 8 13 Bareilly 4 28 11 14 Basti 3 2 21 6 15 Bhadohi 2 1 14 6 16 Bijnor 2 14 5 17 Budaun 4 28 11 18 Bulandshahr 4 28 11 19 Chandauli 2 1 14 6 20 Chitrakoot 2 1 14 5 21 Deoria 3 2 21 8 22 Etah 3 1 21 8 23 Etawah 2 14 5 24 Faizabad (Ayodhya) 3 1 21 8 25 Farrukhabad 3 1 21 9 26 Fatehpur 3 2 21 5 27 Firozabad 4 28 8 28 Gautam Buddh Nagar 3 21 9 29 Ghaziabad 4 28 12 30 Ghazipur 3 2 21 9 31 Gonda 2 1 14 4 32 Gorakhpur 4 28 11 33 Hamirpur 3 2 21 9 34 Hapur 3 2 21 9 35 Hathras 2 1 14 4 36 Hardoi 4 3 28 9 37 Jalaun 2 14 5 6Judicial Officers in FTSCs 7 support staff for each FTSC Sr.No Districts Total Total Sanctioned Vacant Sanctioned Vacant strength strength 38 Jaunpur 3 21 9 39 Jhansi 2 14 5 40 Jyotiba Phule Nagar 3 21 9 41 Kannauj 2 1 14 4 42 Kanpur Dehat 3 21 8 43 Kanpur 3 21 8 44 Kasganj 2 1 14 6 45 Kaushambi 4 3 28 12 46 Kushinagar 4 3 28 7 47 Lakhimpur Kheri 3 2 21 3 48 Lalitpur 2 1 14 5 49 Lucknow 4 28 11 50 Maharajganj 3 2 21 8 51 Mahoba 2 1 14 4 52 Mainpuri 3 21 9 53 Mathura 3 21 9 54 Mau 3 2 21 8 55 Meerut 4 28 10 56 Mirzapur 2 1 14 4 57 Moradabad 3 21 9 58 Muzaffarnagar 3 21 7 59 Pilibhit 3 21 8 60 Pratapgarh 3 2 21 6 61 Raebareli 4 28 10 62 Rampur 3 21 9 63 Saharanpur 3 21 8 64 Sambhal 2 1 14 4 65 Sant Kabir Nagar 3 2 21 7 66 Shahjahanpur 3 21 8 67 Shamli 2 1 14 4 68 Shravasti 2 1 14 6 69 Siddharthnagar 3 2 21 2 70 Sitapur 4 2 28 11 71 Sonbhadra 2 1 14 6 72 Sultanpur 3 2 21 5 73 Unnao 3 21 8 74 Varanasi 4 28 11 TOTAL 218 63 1526 546 Source: As per data provided by the High Court. 7

Continue your research