Home India Ministry of Corporate Affairs Parliament Question: Penalties for Related-Party Transaction...
Date: 2025-08-04 Category: Not Applicable State: Union Government Country: India

Parliament Question: Penalties for Related-Party Transactions

Issued by Ministry of Corporate Affairs · Not Applicable

Research with AI Agent Chat with Document Generate Summary Translate Helpful Share Add to Project Create Task

Executive Summary & Key Takeaways

Executive Summary: This document is a response to questions raised in Lok Sabha regarding penalties for Related Party Transactions (RPTs) under the Companies Act, 2013. It clarifies the rationale behind newsletters, distinctions between listed and unlisted companies, and measures for transparency in RPT disclosures. The response covers the period up to August 4, 2025, and includes details of investigations and awareness programs. Key Points / Main Content: Newsletter Information: * The Ministry publishes a monthly newsletter that is informative. Definition of Listed Company: * A listed company is defined as one having securities listed on a recognized stock exchange as per Section 2(52) of the Companies Act, 2013. * Specific types of public and private companies are excluded from being considered listed companies, even if they have listed certain debt or preference shares. Transparency Measures in Related Party Transactions: * The Companies Act, 2013 defines "related party" under Section 2(76), including directors, key managerial personnel, relatives, and associated entities. * Section 188 and Rule 15 outline conditions for contracts or arrangements with related parties. * Section 177(4)(iv) mandates Audit Committee approval for related party transactions. * Section 134(3)(h) requires disclosure of related party contracts or arrangements in the Board's report. * Compliance is ensured through approvals, Independent Directors' oversight, and actions based on inquiry reports, including adjudication and prosecution. Dewas and Shajapur Districts: * No investigations or penalties for fund diversion or non-disclosure of RPTs have been taken in Dewas and Shajapur districts in the last three years. Awareness Programs: * No specific awareness programs for MSMEs and industrial units have been organized by the Ministry. Impact Analysis: Companies: * Impact: Must adhere to definitions and regulations concerning Related Party Transactions to ensure compliance. * Action Required: Review and update internal controls and disclosures related to RPTs to align with the Companies Act, 2013. Listed Companies: * Impact: Subject to specific regulations and definitions regarding related party transactions and disclosures. * Action Required: Ensure compliance with listing regulations and specific definitions for listed companies. Independent Directors: * Impact: Have increased oversight and approval responsibilities related to RPTs. * Action Required: Exercise diligence in reviewing and approving RPTs within their respective committees (Audit, Nomination and Remuneration, Risk Management, CSR). Ministry of Corporate Affairs: * Impact: Responsible for enforcing regulations and conducting inquiries related to RPTs. * Action Required: Continue monitoring compliance and taking appropriate action based on inquiry reports. MSMEs and Industrial Units: * Impact: Should be aware of RPT regulations, although no specific awareness programs are currently in place. * Action Required: Proactively seek information and ensure compliance with RPT regulations, even without targeted government programs.

Key Entities Referenced

Related Party Transactions: Transactions between a company and its related parties, subject to specific regulations and disclosures under the Companies Act, 2013. Companies Act, 2013: A law in India that governs company incorporation, regulation, and winding up, including provisions for related party transactions and transparency. Ministry of Corporate Affairs: The government ministry responsible for administering the Companies Act, 2013 and regulating corporate affairs in India. Nirmala Sitharaman: The Minister of Finance & Corporate Affairs at the time of the response to the Lok Sabha question. Lok Sabha: The lower house of the Parliament of India, where the starred question regarding related party transactions was raised. Dewas, Madhya Pradesh: A district in Madhya Pradesh, India, mentioned in the context of companies investigated or penalized for fund diversion or non-disclosure of related party transactions. Shajapur, Madhya Pradesh: A district in Madhya Pradesh, India, mentioned in the context of companies investigated or penalized for fund diversion or non-disclosure of related party transactions. SEBI Issue and Listing of Debt Securities Regulations, 2008: Regulations by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) governing the issue and listing of debt securities.
Official Source Record View Original Source →
See Full Document Text
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS LOK SABHA STARRED QUESTION NO. *203 ANSWERED ON MONDAY, AUGUST 04, 2025 PENALTIES FOR RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS QUESTION *203. SMT. APARAJITA SARANGI: SHRI PRATAP CHANDRA SARANGI: Will the Minister of CORPORATE AFFAIRS be pleased to state: (a) the rationale behind the April newsletter issued by the Ministry highlighting penalties for Related-Party Transactions; (b) the differentiation between listed companies and other companies; (c) the measures taken by the Government to ensure transparency in Related-Party Transactions disclosures; (d) whether the Government has taken concrete steps to ensure transparency in Related-Party Transactions disclosures and to curb fund diversion and abuse of Related-Party transactions under the Companies Act, 2013; (e) if so, the details of such measures and their impact on companies operating in industrial areas of Dewas and Shajapur Lok Sabha Constituency; (f) the number of companies in Dewas-Shajapur investigated or penalised for fund diversion or non-disclosure of Related-Party transactions during the last three years; and (g) whether any local or regional compliance outreach programme have been conducted to improve awareness among MSMEs and industrial units, if so, the details thereof? ANSWER MINISTER OF FINANCE & CORPORATE AFFAIRS (SMT. NIRMALA SITHARAMAN) (a) to (g) : A statement is laid on the Table of the House.STATEMENT REFERRED TO IN REPLY TO LOK SABHA STARRED QUESTION *203 FOR ANSWER ON 04.08.2025. (a) Publication of newsletter is a monthly exercise and is informative in nature only. The previous news letters published included topics such as prevention of oppression and mismanagement, Corporate Insolvency Resolution process (CIRP), Incorporation of Companies etc. (b) Listed company means a company which has any of its securities listed on any recognized stock exchange as per section 2 (52) of the Companies Act, 2013 (the Act). Following classes of companies shall not be considered as listed companies in terms of proviso to clause (52) of section 2 of the Act read with Rule 2A of Companies (Specification of Definitions Details) Rules, 2014 :- (a) Public companies which have not listed their equity shares on a recognized stock exchange but have listed their – (i) non-convertible debt securities issued on private placement basis in terms of SEBI (Issue and Listing of Debt Securities) Regulations, 2008; or (ii) non-convertible redeemable preference shares issued on private placement basis in terms of SEBI (Issue and Listing of Non-Convertible Redeemable Preference Shares) Regulations, 2013; or (iii) both categories of (i) & (ii) above. (b) Private companies which have listed their non-convertible debt securities on private placement basis on a recognized stock exchange in terms of SEBI (Issue and Listing of Debt Securities) Regulations, 2008; (c) Public companies which have not listed their equity shares on a recognized stock exchange but whose equity shares are listed on a stock exchange in a jurisdiction as specified in sub- section (3) of section 23 of the Act. Further, any other category of company would be non-listed company.(c) & (d) To provide transparency, the Companies Act, 2013 provides for definition of Related-party and for various requirements in respect of approval including disclosures in respect of related party transactions. The details of the important provisions are as under: - (1) Section 2(76) of the Act define "related party", with reference to a company, means— (i) a director or his relative; (ii) a key managerial personnel or his relative; (iii) a firm, in which a director, manager or his relative is a partner; (iv) a private company in which a director or manager or his relative is a member or director; (v) a public company in which a director or manager is a director and holds along with his relatives, more than two per cent of its paid-up share capital; (vi) any body corporate whose Board of Directors, managing director or manager is accustomed to act in accordance with the advice, directions or instructions of a director or manager; (vii) any person on whose advice, directions or instructions a director or manager is accustomed to act. Provided that nothing in sub-clauses (vi) and (vii) shall apply to the advice, directions or instructions given in a professional capacity; (viii) any body corporate which is— (A) a holding, subsidiary or an associate company of such company; (B) a subsidiary of a holding company to which it is also a subsidiary; or (C) an investing company or the venturer of the company. Explanation.— For the purpose of this clause, "the investing company or the venturer of a company" means a body corporate whose investment in the company would result in the company becoming an associate company of the body corporate. (ix) such other person as may be prescribed.(2) Section 188 of the Act read with Rule 15 of Companies (Meetings of Board and its Powers) Rules, 2014 provides for various conditions for entering into contract or arrangement with a related party. (3) Section 177 (4) (iv) of the Act, functions of the Audit committee include approval or any subsequent modification of transactions of the company with related parties. (4) The Board’s report u/s 134 (3) (h) of the Act requires disclosure in respect of particulars of contracts or arrangements with related parties referred to in sub-section (1) of section 188 in the prescribed form. To ensure compliance of provisions pertaining to Related-Party Transactions, approvals are required under the Companies Act, 2013 including oversight function to be performed by the Independent Directors in various committees viz Audit Committee, Nomination and Remuneration Committee, Risk Management Committee, CSR Committee etc. Further, in case violations based on Inquiry, Inspection and Investigation Reports are found, appropriate action as per law is taken including adjudication, prosecution, winding-up, disgorgement of assets etc. (e)&(f) : In the last three years no such action has been taken for companies in the districts of Dewas and Shajapur. (g) : No specific awareness programme for MSME and Industrial units have been organised by this Ministry. ******

Continue your research