See Full Document Text
GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
ABSTRACT
Public Services – Treasuries and Accounts Department – Pension Payment
Offices, Hyderabad – Fraudulent drawal of pensions by Sri Md.Ashfaq, formerly
private receipt writer O/o APPO, Chandrayanagutta and Sri Md. Ibrahim
Khaleel, Controller, APSRTC, Barkatpura to a tune of Rs.20.54 lakhs –
Departmental Proceedings initiated against Retired Officers/in Service Officers
of PPO Unit of Treasuries and Accounts Department – Disciplinary action
against Sri M.M. Asif Ali Khan, APPO (Retd) – Imposition of punishment of
withholding of Rs.2,000/-( Rupees two thousand) per month from his pension
for a period of (10) ten months under Rule 9 of A.P. Revised Pension Rules,
1980 – Orders – Issued.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINANCE (ADMN.I.VIG.) DEPARTMENT
G.O.Rt.No. 593 Dated:22.02-2012
Read the following:-
1 Charge Memo. in G.O.Rt.No.833 Finance (Admn.I Vig.)
Department dated 18.3.2004
2 Defence Statement of Sri M.M. Asif Ali Khan, APPO (Retd)
dated nil.
3) G.O.Rt.No.4512, Finance (Admn.I.Vig) Dept, dt:19.11.2008
4) Enquiry Report of Sri Janak Raj, Commissioner of Inquiries
D.O.Lr.No.2128/COI.JR/2008,dt:05-11-2009.
5) Show Cause Notice in Govt.Memo.No.13365-
A/42/A2/Admn.I.Vig/2003 dt 17.11.2009 through JD, PPO
Endt.No.A1/K/8022/JD/PPO/2010 dated 18.3.2010
6) DTA. Lr.No. K(II)8/22856/2001, dated 27-03-2010 along with
Representation of Sri Sri M.M. Asif Ali Khan, APPO (Retd)
dated 15.7.2010
7) Final Show Cause Notice in Govt.Memo.No.13365A/42/A2/
Admn.I.Vig/2003-6,dated:22.6.2010
8) Explanation of Sri Sri M.M. Asif Ali Khan, APPO (Retd)dated
15.7.2010.
9) Govt. Letter No. 13365-A/42/Admn.I.Vig/2003, dated
22.9.2011 addressed to Secretary, APPSC.
10) From the Secretary, APPSC Lr.No.186/RT-I/3/2011, dated
9.12.2011.
* * * * *
ORDER:
The Director of Treasuries and Accounts reported that a case of
fraudulent drawals took place in the offices of Assistant Pension Payment
Officers, Chandrayangutta, Motigally, Nampally, Punjagutta and
Narayanaguda. This came to light when the Banjara Hills Police have nabbed
two culprits – Sri Md.Ashfaq and Sri Ibrahim Khaleel. The preliminary reports
indicated that the said Sri Mohd Ashfaq, who worked earlier as pension receipt
writer at the O/o the APPO, Chandrayanagutta made use of his knowledge of
pension payment procedures and his contacts with the staff of the office of
different APPOs and resorted to fraudulent drawls by adopting dubious means.
The enquiries have revealed that the culprits used to make representations in
the name of the deceased pensioners, and get the addresses changed, change
the bank of the pensioners and drew the amounts fraudulently. The Police
investigations revealed that the culprits have resorted to this kind of fraud in
about 30 cases. On the request of the police the probable amounts of those
fraudulent drawals has been estimated to be Rs.20,54,000/-. A criminal case in
this matter has been registered in the Banjara Hills Police Station and it is
under investigation. On detection of this fraud, the department undertook a
detailed verification of those 30 Pension Payment Orders and found that the
Assistant Pension Payment Officers have allowed the change of bank merely
based on the option form or a representation received in the name of the
pensioner and credited pension to the new bank account without following the
prescribed procedure. The descriptive rolls were changed by affixing the
photographs of the fake pensioners. The Assistant Pension Payment Officers
concerned have failed to keep records in the safe-custody and thereby given
scope for the culprits and those who connived with them to have easy access
and commit the fraud. The Charged Officers failed to follow the procedureprescribed in SRs.64 to 87 under TR.16 of A.P. Treasury Code. Vol-I and the
procedure prescribed in G.O.Ms.No.213, Finance & Planning (FW PSC)
Department, dated.19.12.1997 and instructions issued thereon from time to
time and thus, they have not only given scope for these fraudulent drawals but
also helped the culprits to continuously draw them over a period of time. They
have not followed appropriate procedure in obtaining the life-certificates,
descriptive rolls and in filing them in the files concerned. These failures have
paved a way for the culprits to tamper with the records of the office and resort
to fraudulent drawals.
2. Departmental Proceedings were initiated against Sri M.M. Asif Ali
Khan, APPO (Retd) along with others of PPO Unit of Treasuries and Accounts
Department who were allegedly responsible for the irregularities and for their
failure to follow the procedure prescribed in SRs.64 to 87 under TR.16 of A.P.
Treasury Code. Vol-I and the procedure prescribed in G.O.Ms No.213, Finance
& Planning (FW PSC) Department, dated.19-12- 1997 and instructions issued
thereon from time to time. The following Article of Charge has been framed
against Sri M.M. Asif Ali Khan, APPO (Retd.) O/o APPO, Malakpet Branch,
vide G.O.Rt.No.833 Finance (Admn.I.Vig) Department dated 18.3.2004.
Charge. I: Sri M.M. Asif Ali Khan, Assistant Pension Payment Officer
(Retired) while working as Assistant Pension Payment Officer during the
period from October, 1998 to June, 2000 has failed to follow the
procedure prescribed in A.P. Treasury Code & the instructions issued
thereon from time to time in making pension disbursements in respect of
the Pension Payment Orders listed in the statement enclosed to the
statement of imputations, and thereby given scope for fraudulent drawal
and is responsible for a loss of Rs.10,089/- to the exchequer.
Thus Sri M.M. Asif Ali Khan, Assistant Pension Payment Officer (Retired)
by the above mentioned acts has exhibited lack of integrity devotion to
duty and conduct unbecoming of a Government Servant and thereby
contravened rule 3 (1) & (2) of A.P. Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964
while he was in service.”
3. In his defence statement, he has stated that the findings of the
Enquiring Authority against him are not justified and that he did not discuss
his statement of defence furnished to the Enquiry Authority on dt.21.5.2009
and that he simply proved the charge basing on the briefs furnished by the
Presenting Officer. He further stated that he enclosed a copy of his statement of
defence dt. 7/2006 submitted to the Joint Director, Pension Payment Office,
Hyderabad in reply to the charge Memo. dated 10.2.2004 issued to him alleging
that he was held responsible for the payment of pension to (1) one bogus
pensioners listed in list of documents amounting to Rs.10,089 during the
period of his officiating as APPO, in the Office of the Asst. Pension Payment
Officer, Malakpet from 10/98 to 6/2000.
4. He further stated that he did not know the replacement of
descriptive rolls of the said bogus pensioner as it might have taken place during
some time prior to his officiating. The place i.e., the branch Office where the
mischievous act took place was not known until the police authorities informed.
The charges have been framed after 4 years from the incident of receiving report
from police authorities about payment of pension to the fake pensioners.
Actually before framing the charges against the employees who worked in the
seat and APPO who initiated in the pages after sending monthly pension with
other pensioners a preliminary enquiry would have conducted and only after
finding the correct person who started the bogus pensioners the charge would
have framed. The enquiring authority in his report was also of an opnion that “
no doubt the real thrust has to be to catch the criminals in the crime, those
employees who connived with them and directly facilitated the Commission of
the crime”. But it has not been done at the juncture when a report was
received from police authorities about the fraudulent drawal of fake pensioners
upon nabbing two outsiders namely Mohd. Ashfaq and Mohd. Ibrahim Khaleel.
Had the action been taken at that juncture it self, and correct person who
connived with those culprits would have caught and the wrong action initiationof framing charges against the employees who were made scapegoats would
have avoided. There was no scope to see the pensioner before making payment
as per G.O.Ms.No.79 Finance & Planning (FW:PSC) Department dated 4.3.1989
and G.O.Ms.No.213, Finance & Planning (FW:PSC) Department dated
19.12.1997 in as much as the pension was being paid through the bank only.
Mustering of pensioner was also dispensed with as the pensioner need not visit
pension payment office as per SR 67(A) under T.R. 16 OF APTC. Vol.1.
5. He further stated that failure to obtain life certificate was not at all
relevant to him as the pensioners have submitted their life certificate on the
specified period. The question of obtaining Life Certificate does not arise. The
briefs of the Presenting Officer are full of in exactitudes as the provisions quoted
by him are deemed to have been super sided with the issue of the above two
GOs as the pensioner was not expected to go over to the pension Payment
Office. Only for the sake of providing the charge, the presenting Officer has
tried to fix up responsibility based on the drag subsidiary rules under T.R 16 of
APTC Vol.1. The same method has been followed even today and there was no
compulsion on the part of the pensioner to appear before the Pension
Disbursing Officer as per G.O.Ms.No.213 Finance (FW:PSC) Department dated
19.12.1997 also. Finally he requested the Government to examine his
statement of deference meticulously and to drop further action against him.
Thus by taking to consideration the above fact, he requested in a honour to
drop further action in the matter.
6. Government, in exercise of the powers conferred by Sub-rule (2) of
Rule 20 of A.P. Civil Services (CC&A) Rules, 1991, appointed Sri Janak Raj, IPS
(Retd.) Commissioner of Inquiries, Department as Inquiry Authority to inquire
into the charges framed against the Charged Officer Sri M.M. Asif Ali Khan,
APPO (Retd)), Treasury and Accounts Department and in exercise of the powers
conferred by Sub-Rule (5) of A.P. Civil Services (CC&A) Rules, 1991 appointed
Sri Jagan Mohan Goud, Joint Director of Treasuries and Accounts O/o the
Director General, Dr. MCR HRDI, Hyderabad as Presenting Officer.
7. The Inquiry Authority, Sri Janak Raj, Commissioner of Inquiries
has submitted his report vide reference 4th read above. In the Enquiry the
charge framed against Sri M.M. Asif Ali Khan, APPO (Retd))has been proved.
While furnishing a copy of the report of Enquiry Officer, a Show Cause Notice
was issued to Sri M.M. Asif Ali Khan, APPO (Retd)) as to why a suitable
punishment should not be imposed against him as the charge framed against
him has been proved in the inquiry vide reference 5th cited.
8. Sri M.M. Asif Ali Khan, APPO (Retd)) in his representation has
stated that there was no scope to see the pensioner before making payment as
per GO.MS.No.79 Finance dated 4.3.1989 and G.O.Ms.No.23, Finance dated
19.12.1997 in as much as the pension was being paid through the bank only.
Mustering of pensioner was also dispensed with as the pensioner need not visit
pension payment office as per S.R 67 (A) 16 of AP.T.C Vol.-I. Hence failure to
obtain life certificate is not at all relevant to him and Govt. to examine his
statement of defence meticulously and to drop further action against him.
Therefore, he has requested the Government to drop further action in the
matter and release all his pensionary benefits.
9. Government after careful consideration of the findings of the
Inquiry Authority and representation of the Charged Officer, has provisionally
decided to impose a punishment of withholding of Rs. 2,000/- from his pension
for a period of 10 months and issued a final Show Cause Notice to him vide
reference 7th read above.
10. Sri M.M. Asif Ali Khan, APPO (Retd)) in his representation has stated that
there was no objection to recover the amount of Rs.10,089/- along with interest
from his pension @ Rs.2000/- per month for a period of 10 months.
11. Government, after careful consideration of the material on record i.e.
Charge Memo., defence statement, finding of the Inquiry Authority, explanation
of the Charged Officer to the Show Cause Notices found that the ChargedOfficer did not follow the provisions contained under Sub Rules 64 to 87 for
payment of pension i.e., he involved in violation of procedure prescribed in A.P.
Treasury Code and instructions issued thereon from time to time in making
pension disbursements in respect of certain pension payment orders. The
Charged Officer has stated that he had followed the orders issued in
G.O.Ms.No.79 Finance (PFW:PSC) Department dated 4.3.1989 and
G.O.Ms.No.213 Finance (FW:PSC) Department dated 19.12.2007 regarding
procedure for payment of pension through the banks and pension shall not be
stopped for life certificate etc., upto the end of December. In the said GOs
orders were issued simplifying procedure in respect of payment of pensions.
Pensions were hitherto paid in cash at PPOs /Treasury Offices. This practice
was changed and made the pensioners to opt for Bank which is nearer to them
for receipt of pension through Banks. The other conditions remain unchanged.
The Charged Officer is under the impression that consequent to the orders
issued in the said GOs, no checks need be effected as the orders issued are
pending amendment to the respective codal provision. This ground is totally
untenable. He should not have presumed this, till such amendments were
issued, the respective codal provisions remained in force and needed to be
followed. Due to non-exercise of checks, fraudulent payment of pensions
occurred due to the replacement of photos and other information in the
descriptive rolls of pension payment orders with bogus photos and rolls.
Mustering of pensioners would have identified such cases. In the G.O.79
Finance (FW:PSC) Department dated 4.3.1989 and G.O.Ms.No.213 Finance
(FW:PSC) Department dated 19.12.1997 orders have been issued for furnishing
necessary certificates through banks, but the process of mustering will help
pension disbursing officer to establish proof of pensioners existence. The
Charged Officer had totally failed to follow the procedure of payment of pension
stipulated under A.P. Treasury Code. Therefore, Government, provisionally
decided to impose a punishment of withholding of Rs.2,000/- from his pension
for a period of (10 )months on Sri M.M. Asif Ali Khan, APPO (Retd)) and
addressed the Secretary, Andhra Pradesh Public Service Commission for
according concurrence of the Commission with the proposed punishment
against Sri M.M. Asif Ali Khan, APPO (Retd) and intimate the same to the
Government for taking further action.
12. The Secretary, A.P. Public Service Commission, Hyderabad in their letter
10th read above, have concurred with the proposal of the Government for
imposition of a punishment of withholding Rs.2,000/- per month from pension
for a period of (10) months on the Charged Officer Sri M.M. Asif Ali Khan, APPO
(Retd).
13. Government accordingly, hereby order for imposition of a punishment of
withholding Rs.2,000/- (Rupees two thousand) per month from his pension
for a period of ten (10) months on the Charged Officer Sri M.M. Asif Ali
Khan, APPO (Retd) under Rule 9 of A.P. Revised Pension Rules, 1980.
14. The Director of Treasuries and Accounts, Hyderabad shall take
necessary further action in the matter accordingly.
15. The G.O. is available on Internet and can be accessed at the
address http://www.goir.ap.gov.in.
(BY ORDER AND IN THE NAME OF THE GOVERNOR OF ANDHRA PRADESH)
Dr.P.V.RAMESH
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT (FP)
To
The individual through Director of Treasuries and Accounts, AP, Hyderabad.
The Director of Treasuries and Accounts, AP, Hyderabad.
The Joint Director, PPO, Hyderabad.
Copy to: The Secretary, A.P. Public Service Commission, AP, Hyderabad.
The Secretary, A.P. Vigilance Commission, A.P., Hyderabad.
The Accountant General, A.P., Hyderabad.
SF/SC
//FORWARDED ::BY ORDER//
SECTION OFFICER