Home India Tariff Authority for Major Ports Authority hereby disposes of the proposal received from the ...
Date: 2017-08-17 Category: Extra Ordinary State: Union Government Country: India

Authority hereby disposes of the proposal received from the Kandla Port Trust KPT for revision of rate structure of Gandhidham

Issued by Tariff Authority for Major Ports · Not Applicable

Research with AI Agent Chat with Document Generate Summary Translate Helpful Share Add to Project Create Task

Executive Summary & Key Takeaways

Executive Summary: This document pertains to the disposal of a proposal received from the Kandla Port Trust (KPT) regarding the revision of the rate structure for the Gandhidham Township of KPT. The proposal, dated April 11, 2016, was under consideration, but a land policy from the Ministry of Shipping (MOS) is still pending. The Tariff Authority for Major Ports (TAMP) has decided to close the proposal, with any revised proposal based on the new MOS policy to be treated as a fresh case. Key Points / Main Content: Background and Previous Orders: * TAMP previously approved lease rentals for KPT Gandhidham Township via Order No. TAMP202010KPT dated April 9, 2012, effective from January 1, 2009, until December 31, 2013. * The validity of the existing rate structure was extended multiple times, with advice to KPT to file a proposal for revision. * Extensions included a 2% annual escalation until revisions by TAMP, considered a temporary measure. * TAMP directed KPT to submit a revision proposal by February 15, 2016, via Order No. TAMP202010KPT dated January 15, 2016. * The last extension, granted on May 24, 2017, is valid until September 30, 2017. Proposal and Consultations: * KPT submitted a proposal on April 11, 2016, for rate structure revision effective January 1, 2014, for five years. * A joint hearing occurred on July 30, 2016, followed by requests for additional information and clarification from KPT. Land Policy Guidelines: * Land Policy Guidelines of 2014 are not applicable to township areas of Kandla, Mumbai, and Kolkata Ports. * TAMP requested clarification from MOS regarding the applicable Land Policy Guidelines. Decision to Close Proposal: * Due to the pending land policy from MOS and the delay since April 2016, TAMP decided to close the proposal dated April 11, 2016. * Any revised proposal from KPT, based on the new MOS policy, will be treated as a new case. Impact Analysis: Kandla Port Trust (KPT): * Impact: The current proposal for rate structure revision for Gandhidham Township is closed. * Action Required: KPT needs to await the new land policy from MOS and submit a revised proposal based on it, which will be treated as a fresh case. Ministry of Shipping (MOS): * Impact: The decision highlights the need for a clear land policy for township areas in major ports. * Action Required: Expedite the formulation and communication of the new land policy for Gandhidham Township to KPT. Users and User Organizations: * Impact: The existing rate structure remains in effect until a new proposal is submitted and approved. * Action Required: Monitor for updates regarding the new land policy and any subsequent changes to the rate structure.

Key Entities Referenced

Tariff Authority for Major Ports: The regulatory body responsible for setting tariffs for major ports in India. It is disposing of a proposal from Kandla Port Trust. Major Port Trusts Act, 1963: The Indian law under which the Tariff Authority for Major Ports is exercising its powers. Kandla Port Trust: A major port trust in India, also referred to as KPT. The document concerns a proposal from KPT regarding the revision of rate structure of Gandhidham Township. Gandhidham Township: A township managed by Kandla Port Trust (KPT). The document focuses on the revision of the rate structure for this township's land. Land Policy Guidelines of 2010: A set of guidelines pertaining to land policy, relevant to the rate structure of Gandhidham Township. Revised Land Policy Guidelines 2014: Amended version of the land policy guidelines which are relevant for revision of rate structure of Gandhidham Township land. Ministry of Shipping: A ministry of the Government of India (MOS) is expected to provide policy guidance on land matters related to the Gandhidham Township, but it has not yet been received. Mumbai Port Trust: One of the three major port trusts (along with Kandla and Kolkata) for which a separate land policy was to be formulated for Township areas.
Official Source Record View Original Source →
See Full Document Text
REGD. NO. D. L.-33004/99 EXTRAORDINARY III— PART III—Section 4 PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY 320] No. 320] NEW DELHI, THURSDAY, AUGUST 17, 2017/SRAVANA 26, 1939 egkiRru iz’kqYd izkf/kdj.k vf/klwpuk eqEcbZ] 27 tqykbZ 2017 la- Vh,,eih@25@2016&dsihVh.—egkiRru U;kl vf/kfu;e] 1963 ¼1963 dk 38½ dh /kkjk 48 ds v/khu inz Rr ‘kfDr;kas dk i;z ksx djrs gq,] ;g ikzf/kdj.k ,rn}~ kjk layXu vkns’kkuqlkj] dkaMyk iRru U;kl ¼dsihVh½ ls dsihVh ds xka/kh/kke VkÅuf’ki ds nj <kaps ds la’kks/ku ds fy, ikzIr iLz rko dk fuiVku djrk gAS egkiRru i’z kqYd izkf/kdj.k la- Vh,,eih@25@2016&dsihVh dkaMyk iRru U;kl ¼dsihVh½ &&&& vkons d dkjs e (i). Jh Vh-,l- ckyklqczefu;u] lnL; ¼foÙk½ (ii). Jh jtr lpj] lnL; ¼vFk’Z kkL=½ vkns'k (tqykbZ] 2017 ds 21 oas fnu ikfjr) ;g ekeyk dkaMyk iRru U;kl ¼dsihVh½ ls dsihVh ds xka/kh/kke VkÅuf’ki ds nj <kaps ds la’kk/sku ds fy, izkIr izLrko fnukad 11 vizyS 2016 ls lacaf/kr gAS 2-1- bl ikzf/kdj.k us vkns’k la- Vh,,eih@20@2010&dsihVh fnukad 9 vizyS 2012 }kjk dsihVh xka/kh/kke Vkmuf’ki ds fy, iVV~ k fdjk;k vueq kfsnr fd;k FkkA ;g vkns’k vf/klwpuk la- 119 fnukad 4 eb Z 2012 }kjk Hkkjr ds jkti= esa vf/klwfpr fd;k x;k FkkA bl izkf/kdj.k }kjk la’kkfs/kr iV~Vk fdjk;s 01 tuojh 2009 ls iow OZ;kih iHzkko ls dk;kZfUor fd, x, Fks vkSj ikap o”kksZ a dh vof/k vFkkZr ~ 31 fnlEcj 2013 rd oS/k FkAs 2-2- mlds ckn] bl izkf/kdj.k us] dsihVh }kjk fd, x, vuqjks/k ds vk/kkj ij] vius vkns’kkas fnukad 30 twu 2014] 31 fnlEcj 2014 vkSj 30 twu 2015 }kjk dsihVh dh xka/kh/kke Vkmuf’ki Hkwfe ds fy, ektS wnk nj <kaps dh o/Skrk dk s le;&le; ij foLrkfjr fd;k FkkA iRz;sd foLrkj ds le;] bl ikzf/kdj.k us iRru dk s lykg nh Fkh fd xka/kh/kke Vkmuf’ki Hkwfe ds fy, nj <kaps ds la’kks/ku ds fy, viuk iLz rko nkf[ky djsA rFkkfi] iRru us fofHkUu dkj.kkas dk mYys[k djrs g,q dksbZ ifzrlkn ugha fn;k FkkA 2-3- dsihVh dh xka/kh/kke Vkmuf’ki Hkwfe ds fy, nj <kaps dh o/Skrk esa foLrkj fd, tkus ds iRz;sd volj ij] tSlkfd 2010 ds Hkwfe uhfr fn’kkfunsZ’kksa vkSj 2014 ds la’kkfs/kr Hkwfe uhfr fn’kkfunsZ’kka s esa fofufnZ”V fd;k x;k g]S bl ikzf/kdj.k us xka/kh/kke Vkmuf’ki Hkwfe ds fy, nj <kaps dh o/Skrk dk le;&le; ij foLrkj bl 5002 GI/2017 (1)2 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY [PART III—SEC. 4)] ikzf/kdj.k }kjk la’kksf/kr fd, tkus rd 2 izfr’kr okf”kdZ o` f) ds lkFk fd;k FkkA foLrkj vkns’kkas esa fofufnZ”V fd;k x;k g S fd 2 ifzr’kr dh okf”kdZ of`) ds lkFk ektS wnk iVV~ k fdjk;ksa dk foLrkj ektS wnk ifjn`’; esa vUrj ls cpus ds fy, dsoy ,d vLFkk;h O;oLFkk gSA foLrkj vkns’kkas esa Hkh ;g dgk x;k gS fd dsihVh }kjk nkf[ky fd, tkus okys iLz rko ds vk/kkj ij xka/kh/kke Vkmuf’ki ds fy, fu/kkfZjr fd, tkus okys iVV~ k fdjk;ksa dks iow OZ;kih iHzkko fn;k tk,xk] tSlkfd dsihVh }kjk vujq ks/k fd;k x;k gSA 2-4- dsihVh ds vujq ks/k ij dsihVh dh xka/kh/kke Vkmuf’ki Hkwfe gsr q ektS wnk nj <kaps esa foLrkj djrs le; bl izkf/kdj.k us vius vkns’k la- Vh,,eih@20@2010&dsihVh fnukad 15 tuojh 2016 }kjk Hkh dsihVh dk s funs’k fn;k Fkk fd dsihVh dh xka/kh/kke Vkmuf’ki Hkwfe ds fy, nj <kaps gsr q viuk iLz rko 15 Qjojh 2016 rd nkf[ky djsA 2-5- bl ikzf/kdj.k }kjk vkns’k la- Vh,,eih@20@2010&dsihVh fnukad 24 eb Z 2017 }kjk Lohd`r dsihVh dh xka/kh/kke Vkmuf’ki Hkwfe ds ektS wnk nj <kaps dk fiNyk foLrkj 30 flrEcj 2017 rd gAS 3-1- dsihVh us vius i= fnukad 11 vizyS 2016 }kjk 01 tuojh 2014 ls 5 o”kkZ sa dh vof/k ds fy, dsihVh dh xka/kh/kke Vkmuf’ki Hkwfe ds nj <kaps ds la’kk/sku ds fy, viuk iLz rko tek fd;k FkkA dsihVh dk iLz rko ^^i’z kqYd ekeyk^^ :Ik esa ita hd`r fd;k x;k Fkk vkSj mi;kDs rkvksa@mi;kDs rk laxBuka s ls ijke’kZ fd;k x;k FkkA 3-2- dsihVh ds iLz rko ij ,d la;qDr luq okbZ 30 tqykbZ 2016 dk s dsihVh ifjlj esa vk;ksftr dh xbZ FkhA la;qDr luq okb Z esa ;Fkk lgefr vulq kj] dsihVh ls la;qDr luq okb Z ls fudydj vkus okyh dqN ckrksa ij dkjZokbZ djus ds fy, gekjs i= fnukad 23 vxLr 2016 }kjk vujq ks/k fd;k x;k FkkA dsihVh us vius i= fnukad 02 fnlEcj 2016 }kjk gekjs }kjk ekaxh xb Z vfrfjDr lwpuk@Li”Vhdj.k vkjS la;qDr luq okbZ ds dk;ZoR`r ls fudydj vk, dkjZokbZ fcUnq ij izfrlkn Hkts k FkkA 3-3- iLz rko dh ikzFkfed laoh{kk ij] dsihVh ls gekjs i= fnukad 02 vxLr 2016 }kjk vfrfjDr lwpuk@Li”Vhdj.k Hkstus dk vujq ks/k fd;k x;k FkkA 4-1- ;gka ij mYys[k djuk ikzlafxd g S fd Hkwfe uhfr fn’kkfunsZ’k] 2014 ds ijS k 10 esa bfcM fn’kkfunsZ’kksa dk nk;jk fofufnZ”V fd;k x;k gAS mDr ijS k esa ;g Hkh dgk x;k g S fd mDr fn’kkfuns’Z k dkaMyk] eqEcbZ vkSj dkys dkrk iRruksa ds Vkmuf’ki {k=s kas ls lacaf/kr Hkwfe;ksa ij ykxw ugha gaS ftuds fy, vyx uhfr cukb Z tk,xhA la’kkfs/kr Hkwfe uhfr fn’kkfunsZ’k] 2014 ds ijS k 5 esa tuojh] 2014 esa ,evks,l }kjk tkjh fd, x, iow Z fn’kkfunsZ’kksa ds ijS k 1- esa ;Fkk fofufnZ”V fn’kkfunsZ’kka s dk s ykxw fd, tkus dh xatq kb’k j[kh xb Z gSA 4-2- vr%] gekjs i= la- Vh,,eih@8@2014&lkekU; fnukad 09 Qjojh 2016 }kjk ,evks,l ls ;g Li”V djus dk vujq ks/k fd;k x;k Fkk fd fdu Hkwfe uhfr fn’kkfunsZ’kksa ds v/khu dsihVh ds xka/kh/kke Vkmuf’ki {k=s dk iVV` k fdjk;k ‘kkflr fd;k tk, tc rd bu rhu egkiRru U;klksa esa Vkmuf’ki {k=s ksa ds fy, ,evks,l }kjk vyx uhfr rS;kj ugha dh tkrh gAS pwafd ,evks,l ls Li”Vhdj.k dh ikzfIr dh irz h{kk Fkh] blfy, gekjs i= fnukad 22 vizyS ] 2016 vkSj vuoq rhZ i=kas fnukad 28 twu 2016 vkSj 14 tqykbZ 2016 }kjk ,evk,s l dk s nksckjk Lej.k djok;k x;k FkkA bl ckjs esa ,evks,l ls fu;fer :Ik ls i=kpkj gk s jgk FkkA dsihVh ls Hkh gekjs i= fnukad 16 eb Z 2016 }kjk vujq ks/k fd;k x;k Fkk fd bl ekeys esa ,evks,l ls ckrphr dh tk,A 5- rRi’pkr] dsihVh us vius i= fnukad 07 tqykbZ 2016 esa dgk Fkk fd iRru us Vkmuf’ki ds fy, elknS k Hkwfe uhfr fn’kkfuns’Z k] 2015 rS;kj dj fy;k gS vkSj dsanhz; ljdkj ds vuqekns u ds fy, vius cksMZ ds vuqekns u ds Ik’pkr ,evks,l dk s vxzfs”kr dj fn;k gAS 6- ,evks,l dk s Hkts s x, gekjs i=kas ds izfrlkn esa] ,evks,l us l{ke izkf/kdkjh ds vueq kns u ls vius i= fnukad 02 vxLr 2016 }kjk lwfpr fd;k gS fd xka/kh/kke Vkmuf’ki ls lacfa/kr Hkwfe ij dsanzh; eaf=eaMy dk vueq kns u izkIr djus ds fy, iLz rko rS;kj fd;k tk jgk gAS ,evks,l us ;g Hkh lwfpr fd;k g S fd dsihVh ds xka/kh/kke Vkmuf’ki ds nj <kaps ds la’kk/sku ds fy, iLz rko dk s jksddj j[kk tk, vkSj bl laca/k esa ,evks,l }kjk uhfr ds ckjs esa crk, tkus ds ckn gh dk;Zokgh dh tk,A 7- mi;ZqDr vuPqNsnka s ls ;g ns[kk tk ldrk g S fd ;g ekeyk viSzy 2016 ls fuiVku ds fy, yafcr gAS dsihVh esa xka/kh/kke Vkmuf’ki Hkwfe ij Hkwfe uhfr ,evks,l ls vHkh rd ikzIr ugha gqb Z gSA pwafd dsihVh dk iLz rko ^^i’z kqYd ekeyk^^ ds :Ik esa ita hd`r fd;k x;k g]S blfy, bl ekeys dk s vfuf’prdky rd yafcr j[kuk bl ikzf/kdj.k ds fy, mi;Dq r ugha gkxs kA 8- mi;ZqDr fLFkfr ds en~nsutj vkSj ;g Hkh Lohdkj djrs g,q fd bl ekeys dk s vfuf’prdky rd [kyq k ugha j[kk tk ldrk] blfy, bl izkf/kdj.k us lexz fopkj&foe’kZ ds vk/kkj ij iLz rko fnukad 11 vizSy 2016 dk s cUn djus dk fu.k;Z fy;k gAS ,evks,l }kjk laisfz”kr dh tkus okyh ubZ uhfr ds vk/kkj ij dsihVh ls tSls vkSj tc la’kksf/kr iLz rko ikzIr gks mls u;k ekeyk ekuk tk,xkA Vh- ,l- ckyklqcez fu;u] lnL; ¼foÙk½ [विज्ञापन-III/4/असा./185/17]III 3 TARIFF AUTHORITY FOR MAJOR PORTS NOTIFICATION Mumbai, the 27th July, 2017 No.TAMP/25/2016-KPT.—In exercise of the powers conferred under Section 48 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963 (38 of 1963), this Authority hereby disposes of the proposal received from the Kandla Port Trust (KPT) for revision of rate structure of Gandhidham Township of KPT, as in the Order appended hereto. TARIFF AUTHORITY FOR MAJOR PORTS No. TAMP/25/2016–KPT Kandla Port Trust (KPT) - - - Applicant QUORUM: (i). Shri. T.S. Balasubramanian, Member (Finance) (ii). Shri. Rajat Sachar, Member (Economic) ORDER (Passed on this 21st day of July 2017) This case relates to the proposal dated 11 April 2016 received from the Kandla Port Trust (KPT) for revision of rate structure of Gandhidham Township of KPT. 2.1. This Authority vide Order No.TAMP/20/2010-KPT dated 9 April 2012 had approved lease rental for KPT Gandhidham Township. The Order was notified in the Gazette of India vide Notification no.119 dated 4 May 2012. The lease rentals revised by this Authority were implementable with retrospective effect from 01 January 2009 and valid for a period of five years, i.e. upto 31 December 2013. 2.2. Thereafter, this Authority has, based on the request made by the KPT, extended the validity of the existing rate structure for Gandhidham Township Land of KPT from time to time vide its Orders dated 30 June 2014, 31 December 2014, 30 June 2015. While on each extension, this Authority has advised the port to file its proposal for revision of rate structure for Gandhidham Township Land. However, the port has not responded stating various reasons. 2.3. On each occasion while extending the validity of the rate structure for Gandhidham Township Land of KPT, as stipulated in the Land Policy Guidelines of 2010 and revised Land Policy Guidelines 2014, this Authority approved the extension of validity of the rate structure for Gandhidham Township land from time to time with 2% annual escalation till they are revised by this Authority. The extension Orders stipulated that the extension of the existing lease rentals with an annual escalation of 2% is only a provisional arrangement to avoid a vacuum in the current scenario. The extension Orders also stated the lease rentals to be fixed for the Gandhidham Township based on a proposal to be filed by the KPT may have to be given retrospective effect, as requested by the KPT. 2.4. While extending the existing rate structure for Gandhidham Township Land of KPT on the request of KPT this Authority vide its Order No.TAMP/20/2010-KPT dated 15 January 2016 also directed KPT to file its proposal for revision of rate structure for Gandhidham Township Land of KPT positively by 15 February 2016. 2.5. The last extension of existing rate structure of Gandhidham Township Land of KPT granted by this Authority vide Order No.TAMP/20/2010-KPT dated 24 May 2017 is till 30 September 2017. 3.1. The KPT vide its letter dated 11 April 2016 has submitted its proposal for revision of rate structure of Gandhidham Township of KPT for the period w.e.f., 01 January 2014 for a period of 5 years. The proposal of KPT was registered as a “tariff case” and taken on consultation with the users/ user organisations. 3.2. A joint hearing on the proposal of KPT was held on 30 July 2016 at the KPT premises. As agreed at the joint hearing, the KPT was requested vide our letter dated 23 August 2016 to take action on a few points arising out of joint hearing. The KPT vide its letter dated 02 December 2016 has furnished its response to additional information/ clarification sought by us and the action point flowing from the proceedings of the joint hearing. 3.3. On preliminary scrutiny of the proposal the KPT was requested to furnish additional information/ clarifications vide our letter dated 02 August 2016.4 THE GAZETTE OF INDIA : EXTRAORDINARY [PART III—SEC. 4)] 4.1. It is relevant here to state that Para 10 of the Land Policy Guidelines, 2014 stipulates the scope of the ibid Guidelines. The said para states that the said guidelines are not applicable to the lands relating to Township areas of Kandla, Mumbai and Kolkata Ports for which separate policy will be formulated. Para 5 of the amended Land Policy Guidelines 2014 maintains the scope of applicability of the guidelines as stipulated in the para 10 of the earlier guidelines issued by the MOS in January 2014. 4.2. The MOS was, therefore, vide our letter No.TAMP/8/2014-Genl. dated 09 February 2016 requested to clarify under which Land Policy Guidelines the lease rent of Gandhidham Township area of KPT is governed till separate policy is formulated by the MOS for the township areas in these three Major Port Trusts. Since clarification from the MOS was still awaited, the MOS was again reminded vide our letter dated 22 April 2016 and subsequent letters dated 28 June 2016 and 14 July 2016. This was followed by regularly with MOS. The KPT was also requested to pursue the matter with MOS vide our dated 16 May 2016. 5. Subsequently, the KPT in its letter dated 07 July 2016 has stated that the port has formulated draft Land Policy Guidelines 2015 for Township and forwarded to MOS after approval of its Board for approval of the Central Government. 6. In response to our letters to MOS, the MOS vide its letter dated 02 August 2016 has informed with the approval of Competent Authority that a proposal seeking approval of the Union Cabinet on Land relating to Gandhidham Township is being prepared. The MOS has also informed that the proposal for revision of rate structure of Gandhidham Township of KPT may be kept on hold and taken up after the MOS conveys the policy in this regard. 7. It can be seen from the above paragraphs that the case is pending for disposal since April 2016. Land Policy on Gandhidham Township Land at KPT is not yet received from MOS. Since the proposal of KPT is registered as a “tariff case” it may not be appropriate for this Authority to keep the case pending indefinitely. 8. In view of the above position and also recognising that the case cannot be kept open indefinitely, this Authority based on collective application of mind decides to close the proposal dated 11 April 2016 of KPT. The revised proposal as and when received from KPT based on new policy to be communicated by MOS, will be treated afresh. T. S. BALASUBRAMANIAN, Member (Finance) [ADVT.-III/4/Exty./185/17] Uploaded by Dte. of Printing at Government of India Press, Ring Road, Mayapuri, New Delhi-110064 and Published by the Controller of Publications, Delhi-110054.

Continue your research