Home India HOM01 - HOME RT-373: Police –Petition of Sri K. Ravi, PC.1827 of 6th Bn.,...
Date: 2012-03-09 Category: Andhra Pradesh GOIR State: Andhra Pradesh Country: India

RT-373: Police –Petition of Sri K. Ravi, PC.1827 of 6th Bn., APSP, against the punishment of PPI for two years with effect –Rejected - Orders – Issued.

Issued by HOM01 - HOME · Not Applicable

Research with AI Agent Chat with Document Generate Summary Translate Helpful Share Add to Project Create Task
Official Source Record View Original Source →
See Full Document Text
GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ABSTRACT Police –Petition of Sri K. Ravi, PC.1827 of 6th Bn., APSP, against the punishment of PPI for two years with effect –Rejected - Orders – Issued. HOME (SER-II) DEPARTMENT G.O.Rt.No. 373 dated:9-3-2012 Read the following: 1. From Sri K. Ravi, PC.1827 of 6th Bn., APSP, petition Dated: Nil 2. Govt.Memo.No.5768/Ser-II/A2/11, dated: 18-3-2011 3. From the DGP, Lr.Rc.No.952/Appeal-4/ 2011, dated: 1-7-2011 ****** ORDER: In the reference 3rd read above, the DGP, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, has informed that Sri K. Ravi, PC.1827 of 6th Bn., APSP,, was dealt with on a P.Roll involving an O.E. for the following delinquency: “PC 1827 Ravi who was attached to HQ coy for duties became absent for duties with effect from 10-11-2004 FN and later on he was taken to duty w.e.f 4-1-2005. He was declared as deserter” 2. The charged officer failed to submit his explanation to the findings of the OE as proved even though he was reminded. The Commandant, 6th BN., APSP, duly following the procedure prescribed under APCS (CC&A) Rules, held the charge as proved and imposed the punishment of Postponement of Increment for two years with effect on future increments and pension, against the above individual treating the absence period as ‘Not on Duty’” vide proceedings C.No.9/Major PR/2005, dated: 4-7-2005. The appeal petition of the charged officer was considered and rejected by the Appellate authority vide proceedings dated: 20-7-2009. The revision petition of the charged officer was considered and rejected by the revisional authority in proceedings dated: 23-12-09. 3. Aggrieved by the above, the individual has submitted a petition to the Government requesting to set aside the penalty of PPI for two years with effect on future increments and pension. 4. Government, after careful examination of the matter, hereby reject the request of Sri K. Ravi, PC.1827 of 6th Bn., APSP, to set aside the penalty of PPI for two years with effect on future increments and pension. 5. The DGP, Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad, is requested to take necessary action accordingly in the matter. The records received in the reference 3rd read above are returned herewith, the receipt of which should be acknowledged. (BY ORDER AND IN THE NAME OF THE GOVERNOR OF ANDHRA PRADESH) AJOYENDRA PYAL PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT To, The Director General of Police, AP, Hyderabad (with records) The individual through DGP, AP, Hyderabad Sc/Sf //Forwarded:: By order// SECTION OFFICER

Continue your research